PLEASE REWRITE THE FOLLOWING POST IN OTHER WORDS AND NOT MAK

PLEASE RE-WRITE THE FOLLOWING POST IN OTHER WORDS AND NOT MAKE IT APPEAR TO NOT BE PLAGIRISM.

The point being made here is on the importance of trust. The answers to the other two questions really do not matter if the answer to “Can I trust you?” is not a yes. The other two questions could have been worded a bit differently and maybe even could have been completely different questions altogether. Again the answers are irrelevant if the answer to the first question is not a yes. In economics transparency ensures trust. Transparency is required in order to ensure that transactions between two parties are in the best interest of each party. At the end of the day this encourages economic transactions to take place.

Transparency in the workplace also encourages trust, however since the relationship between employer and employee is a more permanent relationship, other aspects of the workplace environment also have a direct bearing on the level of trust. In economics the same way that trust encourages a higher volume and higher quality transactions, it is my opinion that the same is true for the business environment. Trust helps to ensure that the transaction between employer and employee is in the best interests of each party. When trust is present between employer and employee the amount of work and the quality of work is likely to be higher than if trust were not present. If you cannot trust someone then it is difficult to concentrate solely on the work. The solution I present to the customer will not be as comprehensive if I had to spend an inordinate amount of time on CYA aspects due to a missing element of trust. I might not have gone the extra mile on some creative/innovative aspect of the solution if I was worried that I could not trust that I would not be punished for talking a calculated risk.

Solution

The point being created here is on the importance of trust. The answers to the opposite 2 queries very don\'t matter if the solution to “Can I trust you?” isn\'t a affirmative. the opposite 2 queries may are worded alittle otherwise and perhaps even may are fully completely different queries altogether. once more the solutions area unit irrelevant if the answer to the primary question isn\'t a affirmative. In political economy transparency ensures trust. Transparency is needed so as to make sure that transactions between 2 parties area unit within the best interest of every party. At the tip of the day this encourages economic transactions to require place.

Transparency within the work conjointly encourages trust, but since the link between leader and worker could be a additional permanent relationship, alternative aspects of the work setting even have an instantaneous referring to the extent of trust. In political economy a similar method that trust encourages a better volume and better quality transactions, it\'s my opinion that a similar is true for the business setting. Trust helps to make sure that the group action between leader and worker is within the best interests of every party. once trust is gift between leader and worker the quantity of labor and also the quality of labor is probably going to be beyond if trust weren\'t gift. If you can\'t trust somebody then it\'s tough to concentrate only on the work. ANswer} I gift to the client won\'t be as comprehensive if I had to pay an excessive quantity of your time on CYA aspects attributable to a missing component of trust. i\'d not have gone the additional mile on some creative/innovative side of the answer if i used to be distressed that I couldn\'t trust that i might not be tarred-and-feathered for talking a calculated risk.