Homework SourseFive years old Cheyenne stark was riding in the back seat of
Five years old Cheyenne stark was riding in the back seat of her parents ford tarus . Cheyenne was no sitting in booster seat . Instead, she was using a seat belt design by Ford , but was wearing the shoulder belt behind her back.The car was involved in collision. An a result, Cheyenne suffered a spinal cord injury and was paralyzed from the waist down.th family filed a suit against Ford motor co , alleging that the seatbelt was defectively designed. Could ford successfully claim that Cheyenne had misused the seatbelt? Why ? Why not? I need elaborate.
Five years old Cheyenne stark was riding in the back seat of her parents ford tarus . Cheyenne was no sitting in booster seat . Instead, she was using a seat belt design by Ford , but was wearing the shoulder belt behind her back.The car was involved in collision. An a result, Cheyenne suffered a spinal cord injury and was paralyzed from the waist down.th family filed a suit against Ford motor co , alleging that the seatbelt was defectively designed. Could ford successfully claim that Cheyenne had misused the seatbelt? Why ? Why not? I need elaborate.
Solution
Yes, Ford can claim that the seat-belt was misused. This is because Cheyenne Stark was not of the appropriate height to use the seat-belt. Moreover, she was not sitting in the booster seat which would have helped alleviate some of the mechanical shocks in the accident.
