How do arguments based on emotion work in different media Ar

How do arguments based on emotion work in different media? Are such arguments more or less effective in books, articles, televisions, films, magazines, street protests, and so on? You might explore how a single medium handles emotional appeals or compare different media. For example, why do the comments pages of blogs seem to encourage angry outbursts? Are newspapers an emotionally colder source of information than television news programs? If so, why

Solution

Arguments based on emotion are effective through various types of media. But, some media affect much more strongly than others. If you see the trouble of a natural calamity like flood or an earthquake on television will affect your emotions more powerful than reading the trouble in an article. Because through reading you cannot get the actual picture only getting an imaginary wage picture not actual or clear, so no more emotional The emotion in books or magazines will make the news more effective through images and the color or size of titles or words to make attention of the readers and let them to think about the news. Now a day’s people are more advanced, so they are using Internet newsgroups and bloggers seem to encourage angry outbursts versus our newspapers and television news programs. Because newspapers and television news programs are only inform people about an issue and this will not affect more on our emotions. Because theses news programs have some restrictions to say about the issues and tis will not provoke the people emotionally. But the Bloggers and internet newsgroups are specific areas where people can express their ideas and emotions without any restrictions, so they can say what they actually want to say. So the effectiveness is very big and encourages angry outbursts