1 Briefly describe Marbury v Madison and its significance in

1. Briefly describe Marbury v. Madison and its significance in the US Supreme Court.

2. What is the importance of the Commerce Clause and its impact regarding federal regulations?

3. Explain and critique the primary alternatives to civil litigation.
4. Provide an example in your State where federal and state governments have

conflicting legislation. (There are several of them in Oregon!)

5. Regarding your example above, who ultimately has the authority? And, what part of the constitution gives them that power?

Solution

1. this case was taken as base and landmark for judicial reviewes in US under article III in constitution. The case resulted from a petition to the Supreme Court by William Marbury, who had been appointed Justice of the Peace in theDistrict of Columbia by President John Adams but whose commission was not subsequently delivered. Marbury petitioned the Supreme Court to force the new Secretary of State James Madison to deliver the documents

2. for free Trade it is the requirements to have commerce clause in federal regulations. it gives the power to the congress to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the serveral states and with Indian tribes.

3. civil litigation refers to the conflicts between two or more lawyers relates to other than coart activities or cases. it may be about the payment issues or any other. primary alternatives to these are, those people should not raise against to one another.

4. usually the employment laws in between state and federal will causes to conflicts. for example federal laws usually thresh holds for employee rights and work place diputes. where as the state laws must abide these federal guidelines and many states usually adopts some form of existing federal statute.

5. usually in this sort of conflilcts the ultimate power will be lies in the hands of federal. upto some extent they consider the openion of state laws.