A clinical trial evaluates a new compound designed to improv
A clinical trial evaluates a new compound designed to improve wound healing in trauma patients. The new compound is compared against a placebo. After treatment for 5 days with the new compound or placebo, the extent of wound healing is measured and the data is shown in the table below. Is there a difference in the extent of wound healing by treatment. Run the appropriate test at a 5% level of significance.
| Treatment | 0-25 | 26-50 | 51-75 | 76-100 | 
| New Compound (n=125) | 15 | 37 | 32 | 41 | 
| Placebo (n=125) | 36 | 45 | 34 | 10 | 
Solution
Formulating the null and alternative hypotheses,              
               
 Ho:   u1 - u2   <=   0  
 Ha:   u1 - u2   >   0  
 At level of significance =    0.05          
 As we can see, this is a    right   tailed test.      
 Calculating the means of each group,              
               
 X1 =    31.25          
 X2 =    31.25          
               
 Calculating the standard deviations of each group,              
               
 s1 =    11.44188213          
 s2 =    14.95270321          
               
 Thus, the standard error of their difference is, by using sD = sqrt(s1^2/n1 + s2^2/n2):              
               
 n1 = sample size of group 1 =    4          
 n2 = sample size of group 2 =    4          
 Thus, df = n1 + n2 - 2 =    6          
 Also, sD =    9.414085192          
               
 Thus, the t statistic will be              
               
 t = [X1 - X2 - uD]/sD =    0          
               
 where uD = hypothesized difference =    0          
               
 Now, the critical value for t is              
               
 tcrit =    +   1.943180281      
               
 Thus, comparing t and tcrit, we decide to   WE FAIL TO REJECT THE NULL HYPOTHESIS.          
               
 Also, using p values,              
               
 p =    0.5          
               
 Comparing this to the significance level,    WE FAIL TO REJECT THE NULL HYPOTHESIS.          
Thus, we have no significant evidence at 0.05 level that there is a greater wound healing in the new compound than in the placebo. [conclusion]

