Let x be a random variable that represents white blood cell
Let x be a random variable that represents white blood cell count per cubic milliliter of whole blood. Assume that x has a distribution that is approximately normal, with mean = 6300 and estimated standard deviation = 2100. A test result of x < 3500 is an indication of leukopenia. This indicates bone marrow depression that may be the result of a viral infection.
(a) What is the probability that, on a single test, x is less than 3500? (Round your answer to four decimal places.)
(b) Suppose a doctor uses the average x for two tests taken about a week apart. What can we say about the probability distribution of x?
The probability distribution of x is not normal.The probability distribution of x is approximately normal with x = 6300 and x = 1050.00. The probability distribution of x is approximately normal with x = 6300 and x = 2100.The probability distribution of x is approximately normal with x = 6300 and x = 1484.92.
What is the probability of x < 3500? (Round your answer to four decimal places.)
(c) Repeat part (b) for n = 3 tests taken a week apart. (Round your answer to four decimal places.)
(d) Compare your answers to parts (a), (b), and (c). How did the probabilities change as n increased?
The probabilities decreased as n increased.The probabilities increased as n increased. The probabilities stayed the same as n increased.
If a person had x < 3500 based on three tests, what conclusion would you draw as a doctor or a nurse?
It would be a common event for a person to have two or three tests below 3,500 purely by chance. The person probably has leukopenia.It would be an extremely rare event for a person to have two or three tests below 3,500 purely by chance. The person probably has leukopenia. It would be an extremely rare event for a person to have two or three tests below 3,500 purely by chance. The person probably does not have leukopenia.It would be a common event for a person to have two or three tests below 3,500 purely by chance. The person probably does not have leukopenia.
Solution
A)
We first get the z score for the critical value. As z = (x - u) / s, then as
x = critical value = 3500
u = mean = 6300
s = standard deviation = 2100
Thus,
z = (x - u) / s = -1.333333333
Thus, using a table/technology, the left tailed area of this is
P(z < -1.333333333 ) = 0.09121122 [ANSWER]
****************
b)
The new standard deviation will be divided by sqrt(2).
The probability distribution of x is approximately normal with x = 6300 and x = 1484.92. [ANSWER]
******************
We first get the z score for the critical value. As z = (x - u) sqrt(n) / s, then as
x = critical value = 3500
u = mean = 6300
n = sample size = 2
s = standard deviation = 2100
Thus,
z = (x - u) * sqrt(n) / s = -1.885618083
Thus, using a table/technology, the left tailed area of this is
P(z < -1.885618083 ) = 0.029673219 [ANSWER]
******************
C)
We first get the z score for the critical value. As z = (x - u) sqrt(n) / s, then as
x = critical value = 3500
u = mean = 6300
n = sample size = 3
s = standard deviation = 2100
Thus,
z = (x - u) * sqrt(n) / s = -2.309401077
Thus, using a table/technology, the left tailed area of this is
P(z < -2.309401077 ) = 0.010460668 [ANSWER]
***********************
d)
The probabilities decreased as n increased. [ANSWER]
************************
It would be an extremely rare event for a person to have two or three tests below 3,500 purely by chance. The person probably has leukopenia. [ANSWER]

