I need three topics for evaluation essay in science any topi

Solution

Topic 1: Codon Preference analysis is a better method to quantify Codon Usage Bias.

[Must contain] The Codon Preference analysis uses three different reading frames for highly expressed genes, low expressed genes and non coding regions. The plot is relied on both codon frequency table and reading frames. This technique has three advantages: independent form of codon preference statistics, analysis is based on one table for on organism and also based on protein expression level. This technique reveals about highly and moderate express genes both. The other method, the Codon Adaptation Index (CAI) is based on the measurement of Codon Usage Bias by a reference set for analysis. This measurement is opposite to Effective Number of Codons in respective of measurement based on Uniform Bias. The reference for CAI is set by highly expressed genes because they would compete with other genes at most for their expression sites. This technique is recently made and it is needed to develop more.

So Codon Preference analysis is good for finding new reading frames in a partially sequenced new organism in compare to CAI. Codon Preference analysis is also a more developed technique than CAI.

Topic 2: Cadaver dissection course for regional anatomy is much needed for medical students to be a good surgeon or physician.

[Must contain] Cadaver dissection course for studying the regional anatomy is called as Whole Body Dissection Course. This course is mainly focused to provide topographical surgical anatomical knowledge. This course is important for students who are looking ahead for studying surgery or other procedural specialties. For the guidance of students surgeons and proceduralists are also available at greatly. Another study, the systemic anatomy Cadaver dissection course is based on study through an organ. The cardiovascular system plays the role for study of this course. This course provides an overview of anatomy which is not enough valuable for the medical students.

Topic 3: Darwin and Wallace’s population thinking theory describes scientifically the inheritance of characters through survival of fittest.

[Must contain] Population thinking reveals the extinction, speciation, and adaptation of individuals regulate the development of population. According Darwin and Wallace, who are the force theorists, the predator-prey relationship between cheetahs and gazelles, as an example, can be described on the basis of theory. The theory which reveals the natural selection that relies on environmental forces. The environment forces in the predator prey relationship are selection for survival; how prey can survive by predator and how predator survives by having its food. Cheetahs need to adopt to prey the gazelles with efficient. There are few chances to kill a gazelle. Cheetahs are adopted for running fast, clear vision and agility. They had evolved claws for controlling their directions and a flat surfaced tail to make their balance. They had pointed pad in their legs which provides a sudden decent startup or sprint. The gazelles are adopted in the term of medium size, long limbs and skin color. Size helps to provide less available surface for capturing, turning, hiding and living in the environment. Long limbs increase the speed of gazelles which is up to 40 miles/ hour. And the skin color helps to camouflage into the surroundings. The all adaptations get only by having selections of high developed organisms. The selected individuals cheetahs and gazelles will increase their generations. The less developed cheetah gets died of food deprivation and less developed gazelles will die by prey. Before the population thinking, there is the rule that use and non use of organs. That theory of use and non use of organs was mostly supported by Lamarck. The organs which need to develop in predator-prey relationship are having tendency of development if there is relationship occurred in between two organisms only. The organs which are described above, according to the theory related to before population thinking, can develop only by uses of them and then animals can carry the character to next generations. This theory is not well accepted because of less potentially, however new Lamarckism supports some developed instincts. But these are not sufficient evidence to proof them better.