In Internet Content Providers and Complicity in Human Rights

In “Internet Content Providers and Complicity in Human Rights Abuse,” Jeffery D. Smith argues that while ICPs may be complicit in human rights abuse, they may strive to minimize their complicity. Do you believe that the strategies he imagines are sufficient to absolve ICPs of any moral wrongdoing that arises from their complicity in these abuses? Why, or why not? If not, what do you believe that ICPs should do?

Solution

In “Internet Content Providers and Complicity in Human Rights Abuse,” Jeffery D. Smith argues that while ICPs may be complicit in human rights abuse, they may strive to minimize their complicity. Do you believe that the strategies he imagines are sufficient to absolve ICPs of any moral wrongdoing that arises from their complicity in these abuses? Why, or why not? If not, what do you believe that ICPs should do?

Answer :

In today\'s E commerce world , people are very much habitual with the internet services.They are doing everything through internet service .In such situations internet services plays a important role.The internet content providers has positive as well as negative impact on customers/ clients.

Yes I am agree with the Jeffery D. Smith ICPs helps to complicit in human rights abuse. Because of social sites , other web sites people are sharing their information on internet.That information is publically available.In such case the crime takes place.

What are the human rights :

The particular strategy is developed by Jeffery D. Smith is not only enough for controlling the Human Rights abuse , we have develop some more strategies for tackiling this issues

Like

More safety & Security

Complete ban of Illegal access

User friendly system

Quick access & Re dressal forum for problem solving

Accountability of the issue generated

System control

SO these are the important aspects in ICP for control  complicit in human rights abuse.