Explain why we might want to assess the strength of evidence

Explain why we might want to assess the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis, rather than delivering a simple “reject H₀ or don’t reject H₀” conclusion? Give an example of when it would benefit to describe the strength of evidence one may have to reject the null instead of simply stating “reject H₀”

Solution

because something somebody is sure that his claim is correct but when you are doing the test hypothesis

you will always have an error so you are never 100% sure of your test