Can you plese answer these Business Law questions I got my o

Can you plese answer these Business Law questions, I got my own answer, I just wanna make sure I am mostly correct. I will appreciate your answers. Just answer true or false.

BA301 Study Questions Chapter 4 Torts and Cyber Torts Fred accidentally bumped into Jake. This is an example of an intentional tort. Fred took Jake\'s bike without permission. In addition to being a crime, this is an intentional tort Fred was skydiving and intended to land in an open field, which he did. As it turned out, the field was owned by Farmer Jones. This is an example of an intentional tort. Fred was skydiving and was blown off course over which he had no control. He landed in Farmer John\'s field. This is not an example of a negligent tort nor an intentional tort. Punitive damages in a tort action are meant to be a punishment of the litigant against whom they were levied Punitive damages are an award for \"hurt\" given to the person injured by another\'s negligent or intentional action. Fred brought Mabel home from a date and at her front door gave her a kiss, which she did not expect nor like. This is an example of battery IfMabel did not see the kiss coming, such would be an example of assault Jake invited Sue to his yacht for dinner. They boarded the yacht at the dock and went for a dinner cruise. After departing the dock and during dinner, Sue wanted to go home Jake lowered the dingy (as small boat) from the yacht into the water, and told Sue if she wanted to go home, she could row there. This is an example of false imprisonment. 6. 8. 9. 10. When Fred took Jake\'s bike without Jake\'s permission, Fred rode it down a very rough I. A negligent tort is based upon an unintended breach of a duty. An intentional tort occurs 12. Concerning fixing one\'s leaky sink, a physician trying to fix the sink is more likely to road and bent the wheel beyond use. This is an example of conversion. where one intentionally breaches a duty lead to negligence than a plumber trying to fix the sink, using the \"reasonable prudent person\" standard. In order for one to not be held liable in tort, one must be as prudent as a reasonable person in the same or similar circumstances 13. n order for one to not be held liable in tort, one must be as prudent as a 14. One cannot have proximate cause without actual cause. One cannot have actual cause 15. Comparative negligence is where the court tries to determine which party is more at without proximate cause fault, and then disallowing the party more at fault from collecting any compensation for damages Fred says nasty things about Jake accusing Jake of being a thief in front of Jake\'s friends. Fred knew this was untrue, but wanted to harm Jake. The friends overheard Fred speak, and understood what Fred said. Given these facts, Fred has committed defamation as to Jake In #16, if the matter were defamation, it would be the slander sub-classification of defamation 16. 17- 18 Fred\'s boss said nasty things to Fred which made Fred mad. Fred in turn was nasty to his secretary, Penelope. Penelope was consequently nasty to her gardener when she got home. Consequently the gardener was nasty to Penelope\'s mailman who, as a consequence, was so upset that he failed to deliver a time-sensitive winning mail-back coupon at the neighbors house, for which the neighbor was waiting anxiously

Solution

Because wrongful act that causes harm, this type of tort raised by punch

2)Yes

It is a False imprisonment one of the types of Intentional Torts

3)Yes

It is a Invasion of Privacy one of the types of Intentional Torts

4)Yes

Unfortunately, he has no control, so he has not intended to do that

5)Yes,

Punitive damages are awarded to punish a wrong activities people