The following code statements appear in sequential order in
     The following code statements appear in sequential order in a program.  float p= 4.0, x;  int q[5] = {l, 4, 9, 16, 25}, y, z;//Assume that the base memory address of array q[] is 5000_dec  x = &p;  p= (x)+1;  y= q;  z= &q;[1];++(z);  q[2]= (y+3)+3;//At this point, write down the values of the following variable expressions. Assume that an int//variable occupies 4 bytes in memory, and a float variable occupies 8 bytes  II P=, x =//Y =, y =//z =, z =//q[1] =, q[2] =  q= q + 2;//Is the above statement legal? If so, what is the new value of q? If not, then why not?  ++y;//Is the above statement legal? If so, what is the new value of y? If not, then why not?![The following code statements appear in sequential order in a program. float p= 4.0, x; int q[5] = {l, 4, 9, 16, 25}, y, z;//Assume that the base memory addres  The following code statements appear in sequential order in a program. float p= 4.0, x; int q[5] = {l, 4, 9, 16, 25}, y, z;//Assume that the base memory addres](/WebImages/28/the-following-code-statements-appear-in-sequential-order-in-1074683-1761563469-0.webp) 
  
  Solution
p=5;
*x=5
y=address of q
*y=1;
z=address of second variable of q
*z=5
q[1]=5
q[2]=19
q=q+2 is illegal. Because q is an array and scalr operatiors aren\'t allowed on it
Question 3:
++y is legal and is allaowed because y is a pointer variable. As it is incremented by 1, it\'ll now point to second variableof array
![The following code statements appear in sequential order in a program. float p= 4.0, x; int q[5] = {l, 4, 9, 16, 25}, y, z;//Assume that the base memory addres  The following code statements appear in sequential order in a program. float p= 4.0, x; int q[5] = {l, 4, 9, 16, 25}, y, z;//Assume that the base memory addres](/WebImages/28/the-following-code-statements-appear-in-sequential-order-in-1074683-1761563469-0.webp)
