Derive Poissons formula for D r theta R2 r a 0 given by

Derive Poisson\'s formula for D = {(r, theta) R^2 | r > a > 0}, given by u(r, theta) = (r^2 - a^2) integral_0^2 pi h()/a^2 - 2ar cos (theta -) + r^2 d/2 where u is a solution of {u_xx + u_yy = 0 for r > a u = h(theta) for r = a u is bounded as r rightarrow infinity.

Solution

1

If f

is analytic inside and on the unit circle , show that for 0<|z|<1,

2if(z)=f(w)wzdwf(w)w1/z¯dw

and then derive the Poisson Integral Formula:

f(rei)=12201r212rcos(t)+r2f(eit)dt,0<r<1.

I know the Cauchy Integral Formula is f(a)=12if(w)wadw

for a inside , and I also know its counterpart for derivatives, which is f(n)(a)=n!2if(w)(wa)n+1dw for a inside

.

The former looks promising in terms of deriving the first equation, if only I can find a

such that f(w)wa=f(w)wzf(w)w1/z¯. I think a key point is working out where 1/z¯ lies in relation to z but I can\'t seem to visualise it, thanks to the function at 0 being a singularity. Is the idea that the first fraction has a zero at w=z and the second at w=1z¯

?

Putting the two fractions over a common denominator gives:

f(w)(w1/z¯)f(w)(wz)(wz)(w1/z¯)=zf(w)(f(w)/z¯)(wz)(w1/z¯)=(z1/z¯)w2w(z+1/z¯)+z/z¯f(w)

which does look a little like the final equation I am trying to find if I let z=rei

.

, letting the second fraction in the first equation become z¯f(w)wz¯1

, I can get the second, however it is negative. I.e. I get

f(rei)=1220r212rcos(t)+r2+1f(eit)dt

1

If f

 Derive Poisson\'s formula for D = {(r, theta) R^2 | r > a > 0}, given by u(r, theta) = (r^2 - a^2) integral_0^2 pi h()/a^2 - 2ar cos (theta -) + r^2 d/2

Get Help Now

Submit a Take Down Notice

Tutor
Tutor: Dr Jack
Most rated tutor on our site