An article presents a study of the effect of the subbase thi
Solution
Part 1 out of 2:
Formulating the null and alternative hypotheses,              
               
 Ho:   u   <=   3  
 Ha:    u   >   3  
               
 As we can see, this is a    right   tailed test.      
               
 df = n - 1 =    5          
               
 Getting the test statistic, as              
               
 X = sample mean =    3.25          
 uo = hypothesized mean =    3          
 n = sample size =    6          
 s = standard deviation =    0.5          
               
 Thus, t = (X - uo) * sqrt(n) / s =    1.224744871          
               
 Also, the p value is              
               
 p =    0.137609866 [ANSWER, P VALUE]          
               
 As P > 0.05, we   FAIL TO REJECT THE NULL HYPOTHESIS.          
       
 Thus, we CANNOT [ANSWER] conclude that the mean surface deflection is greater than 3 mm.
*******************
Part 2 out of 2:
Formulating the null and alternative hypotheses,              
               
 Ho:   u   <=   2.5  
 Ha:    u   >   2.5  
               
 As we can see, this is a    right   tailed test.      
               
 df = n - 1 =    5          
               
 Getting the test statistic, as              
               
 X = sample mean =    3.25          
 uo = hypothesized mean =    2.5          
 n = sample size =    6          
 s = standard deviation =    0.5          
               
 Thus, t = (X - uo) * sqrt(n) / s =    3.674234614          
               
 Also, the p value is              
               
 p =    0.007189865   [ANSWER, P VALUE]      
               
 As P < 0.05, we   REJECT THE NULL HYPOTHESIS.          
Thus, we CAN [ANSWER] conclude that the mean surface deflection is greater than 2.50 mm.


