The idea behind ethical pluralism is that each one of the Fo

The idea behind ethical pluralism is that each one of the Four Ethical Lenses provides a useful perspective to help determine what particular action is ethical. Someone from the Rights/Responsibilities Lens might ask, \"what are my rights and responsibilities?\" Someone from the Results Lens might ask, \"What are good results with consequences I\'m willing to tolerate?\" Someone from the Relationship Lens might ask, \"What is fair so that power is balanced?\" And, someone from the Reputation Lensmight ask, \"What actions would set a good example?\" As you reflect on the four foundational questions, which one is easier for you to answer when faced with a problem? Why? What would be the value (if any) of asking all four questions when you had an ethical dilemma before you chose a course of action?

Solution

among the 4 questions, the first one can be easily answered and one can deal. becaues while we are work or at any place usually we knows what is our role, what obligations we are going to be perform and what are the rights we can enjoy during the session. even when we faced problmes relating to this, we can solve these kind of problmes easily than the other 3 questions.

one should face these sort of consequences while we are at work place. and that is uniqueness, one will act in a different way, one will react in an unique way. and based on our conditions at the time and the situation we may react. we can not predefine those sort of answers. we can answer them based on our mental ability and the seriousness of the problem.