Four treatments were compared using a completely randomized

Four treatments were compared using a completely randomized design. The data are shown here:


Table 1.

      Treatment
1 2 3 4


124 147 141 117
167 121 144 128
135 136 139 102
160 114 162 119
159 129 155 128
144 117 150 123
133 109


Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate a di fference in location for at least two of the
population distributions? Test using the Kruskal-Wallis H test with alpha = 0.05.

Solution

Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate a di fference in location for at least two of the
population distributions? Test using the Kruskal-Wallis H test with alpha = 0.05.

No.

Label

Data

Rank

1

T1

124

9

2

T1

167

26

3

T1

135

14

4

T1

160

24

5

T1

159

23

6

T1

144

18.5

7

T1

133

13

8

T2

147

20

9

T2

121

7

10

T2

136

15

11

T2

114

3

12

T2

129

12

13

T2

117

4.5

14

T2

109

2

15

T3

141

17

16

T3

144

18.5

17

T3

139

16

18

T3

162

25

19

T3

155

22

20

T3

150

21

21

T4

117

4.5

22

T4

128

10.5

23

T4

102

1

24

T4

119

6

25

T4

128

10.5

26

T4

123

8

Kruskal-Wallis Rank Test for Differences in Medians

Data

Level of Significance

0.05

Group

Sample Size

Sum of Ranks

Mean Ranks

T1

7

127.5

18.2143

Intermediate Calculations

T2

7

63.5

9.0714

Sum of Squared Ranks/Sample Size

5551.774

T3

6

119.5

19.9167

Sum of Sample Sizes

26

T4

6

40.5

6.7500

Number of Groups

4

Test Result

H Test Statistic

13.9021

Critical Value

7.8147

p-Value

0.0030

Reject the null hypothesis

DF=3

Calculated test value 13.9021 > 7.8147 the table value.

The null hypothesis is rejected

The data provide sufficient evidence to indicate a difference in location for at least two of the
population distributions.

No.

Label

Data

Rank

1

T1

124

9

2

T1

167

26

3

T1

135

14

4

T1

160

24

5

T1

159

23

6

T1

144

18.5

7

T1

133

13

8

T2

147

20

9

T2

121

7

10

T2

136

15

11

T2

114

3

12

T2

129

12

13

T2

117

4.5

14

T2

109

2

15

T3

141

17

16

T3

144

18.5

17

T3

139

16

18

T3

162

25

19

T3

155

22

20

T3

150

21

21

T4

117

4.5

22

T4

128

10.5

23

T4

102

1

24

T4

119

6

25

T4

128

10.5

26

T4

123

8

Four treatments were compared using a completely randomized design. The data are shown here: Table 1. Treatment 1 2 3 4 124 147 141 117 167 121 144 128 135 136
Four treatments were compared using a completely randomized design. The data are shown here: Table 1. Treatment 1 2 3 4 124 147 141 117 167 121 144 128 135 136
Four treatments were compared using a completely randomized design. The data are shown here: Table 1. Treatment 1 2 3 4 124 147 141 117 167 121 144 128 135 136
Four treatments were compared using a completely randomized design. The data are shown here: Table 1. Treatment 1 2 3 4 124 147 141 117 167 121 144 128 135 136
Four treatments were compared using a completely randomized design. The data are shown here: Table 1. Treatment 1 2 3 4 124 147 141 117 167 121 144 128 135 136
Four treatments were compared using a completely randomized design. The data are shown here: Table 1. Treatment 1 2 3 4 124 147 141 117 167 121 144 128 135 136

Get Help Now

Submit a Take Down Notice

Tutor
Tutor: Dr Jack
Most rated tutor on our site