Discussion Topic 5 p 199 A debate is raging at the IT consul
Discussion Topic, #5, p. 199
A debate is raging at the IT consulting firm where you work. Some staff members believe that it is harder for experienced analysts to learn object-modeling techniques, because the analysts are accustomed to thinking about data and processes as separate entitites. Others believe that solid analytical skills are easily transferable and do not see a problem in crossing over the newer approach. What do you think, and why?
Solution
U take the example of Kernel in computer.
Whatever computer code we have a tendency to run it uses the same Kernel. All the softwares asks for different services from identical Kernel.
However all the softwares look completely different from one another. They may diverge in appearance, functionality, objective etc. But the truth is Kernel stay same.
Take another example. U study any computer language. Each language has completely different commands, statements and looks, but if u recognize the formula u will code this formula in any language. It means basics of programming can stay same. No matter what language u use.
In alternative words if u recognize fundamentals of programming u will learn other languages simply.
Because nearly all the languages have loops, thier loops look differently however their operate is same in all languages.
So conclusion is if ones fundamentals square measure clear there\'s no downside in change. If one is a parrot one cant speak aside from some sentances
