Homework SourseFind at least two articles on prioritizing projects Compare
Find at least two articles on prioritizing projects. Compare and contrast the two articles you found and create a three- to four-page Word document (synopsis) in APA format on what you found different about each article. Other items that need to be addressed in your paper include the urgency of each project, the cost of delaying the expected benefits from various projects, and practical details concerning the timing.
Solution
Prioritizing of Two Project namely (1) Portfolio Management and (2) IP Project .
A copy of the APA file in word is enclosed and copy there of pasted herein below. APA is new to me so some short of adornment is required at your end . However content is sufficient
APA Style Sixth Edition Template: This Is Just an Example Title That Has a Colon In It
Mr X / Ms Y
Southern College of USA
Author Note
A brief author note (Paul Rose’s Project Prioritizing ) goes here. This note may include acknowledgment of funding sources, expressions of gratitude to research assistants, Mr. P, Ms. T and contact information for the author who will handle requests. I have a few notes of my own to share. First, thanks to everyone who has suggested improvements; I’m sorry I can’t acknowledge you all here. If anyone else badly needs to email me, try searching with “Paul Rose”. Second, you are hereby granted permission to use this document for learning and research purposes. You may not sell this document either by itself or in combination with other products or services. Third, if you use this document, you use it at your own risk. The document’s accuracy and safety have been thoroughly evaluated, but they are not guaranteed. Fourth, if you find this document helpful, I would be grateful if you would click on this URL: http://homeworkmarket.com/content/ prioritizing-, It directs to a harmless Department of Psychology web page at SIUE, and records click-through data that give me an idea of how many people have found this document helpful.
Prioritizing Project on Portfolio Management and IT Project.
The key points of the Article of the project is the prioritizing of two project namely Portfolio Investment in lowest investment and maximization of its income and It Project - its comparison pros and cons of the two projects. For simpler papers in Paul Rose’s Project, a somewhat shorter abstract is fine. The purpose of the abstract is to provide the reader with a brief overview of the paper. When in doubt about a rule, please refer the sixth edition APA style manual rather than relying on this template. (I preferred only one space after a period, two spaces after a period are suggested by the sixth-edition APA manual at the top of page 88.), that I am in debt to an unknown author who spared me the inconvenience of having to create my own templates from scratch.
Keywords: writing, template, sixth, edition, APA, format, style, self-discipline
Prioritizing Project on Portfolio Management and IT Project.
The key points of the Article of the project is the prioritizing of two project namely Portfolio Investment in lowest investment and maximization of its income and It Project - its comparison pros and cons of the two projects.
Project 1. The Portfolio Management : How to prioritize and manage projects for maximum value.
In a do more –with –less investment and less efforts and pain , the investment and wealth managers are in the position of saying no to new spending ideas. That makes at is very vital to actively engage the business side in IT planning. A person can consider it sharing responsibility for making hard choices; or he / she could think of it as building a common view of the organization’s priorities.
.
Heading Level – Immerse the Business First
Making Investment smartly:
One way to immerse the business feet first its through portfolio management . Using this process, technology and business leaders to identify the goals of the business , and than use objective criteria to prioritize and manage projects to achieve the highest value from the IT portfolio. All projects are viewed in relation to one another, not on a standalone basis. High –Risk projects are balanced with low risk and short term with long term. It follows the same principles as those employed in managing a financial portfolio.
For the sake of understanding, a user / investor / beneficiary might look at this / her /their portfolio and realize that the most of the It projects are in sales and none in manufacturing. That might be due to less real needs and more to the fact that the CEO of the sales division is a master at scoring It investment in US dollars. A portfolio management approach attempts to take the politics out of investment decisions by taking a birds-eye-view of the enterprise.
Mr. Tim , a IT-Runner’s Vice President and Executive programs research director , said there are two big differences between the traditional way of choosing IT projects and its portfolio.
Heading level 3. (Life Cycle of the Project)
The first is a life cycle view of a project. “In the past, once you got approval, no more looked at the project again. User got a blank check. Under portfolio management, every time you review - typically quarterly – user look at every project and say , does it make sense ? if it doesn’t , the user may kill it , Tim sais.
Heading level 4.( the second thought)
The second is that looking at all projects together allows the user to spot / detect imbalances – too many high risk projects or vice versa , too many safe investments implies lesser income and growth. The user may link the risk aspect in beta term – systematic and unsystematic risk aspect – continually re-balance to ensure maximum value within risk framework
Heading level 5.[( Project prioritizing – II- Identification, (mutually exclusive)]
Identify It projects for a real or made up company of the users choice. The user can draw on their / his / her past experience or create his / her own projects. Pick 3 to 5 projects so that the user can compare projects described in the assignment. The paper/ pprojects must evaluate each identified project against the following criteria:
The Comparison and differences:
The Project I is classical guideline for project evaluation and prioritize and project II is based on past experience and apply judicial mind.
The first one guidelines for beginners and the second one for the experienced.
The first one concentrate on wealth maximization , whereas the second one emphasize on the required return (cut off) the user risk management
Heading 5. (The Urgency of each projects )
As the user is holding the enough resources to invest and the interest earning is very low than the targeted income, So it is utmost urgent to identify the viable projects and invest into them. The abnormal delay defy the very purpose of project prioritizing.
Heading 6 ( Cost delaying the expected benefits)
The corpus of fund was received from the various stake holders to earn more and more money that the bank interest or interest from safe federal bonds. So the investment Manager has a prime responsibility to prioritize some projects and make an intelligent portfolio of It projects and can also invest some pertion in other viable projects to keep the beta risk, systematic as well as unsystematic risks.
Citations and References
Reference : CIO awards The Homework Market.
References
Chuck Tucker – Vice President of Gartner
Eminent books on Portfolio Management and Risk Management.
Footnotes
1 Some professional journals ask authors to avoid using footnotes. In an undergraduate paper they are almost never necessary.
| APA Style Sixth Edition Template: This Is Just an Example Title That Has a Colon In It Mr X / Ms Y Southern College of USA Author Note A brief author note (Paul Rose’s Project Prioritizing ) goes here. This note may include acknowledgment of funding sources, expressions of gratitude to research assistants, Mr. P, Ms. T and contact information for the author who will handle requests. I have a few notes of my own to share. First, thanks to everyone who has suggested improvements; I’m sorry I can’t acknowledge you all here. If anyone else badly needs to email me, try searching with “Paul Rose”. Second, you are hereby granted permission to use this document for learning and research purposes. You may not sell this document either by itself or in combination with other products or services. Third, if you use this document, you use it at your own risk. The document’s accuracy and safety have been thoroughly evaluated, but they are not guaranteed. Fourth, if you find this document helpful, I would be grateful if you would click on this URL: http://homeworkmarket.com/content/ prioritizing-, It directs to a harmless Department of Psychology web page at SIUE, and records click-through data that give me an idea of how many people have found this document helpful. Prioritizing Project on Portfolio Management and IT Project. The key points of the Article of the project is the prioritizing of two project namely Portfolio Investment in lowest investment and maximization of its income and It Project - its comparison pros and cons of the two projects. For simpler papers in Paul Rose’s Project, a somewhat shorter abstract is fine. The purpose of the abstract is to provide the reader with a brief overview of the paper. When in doubt about a rule, please refer the sixth edition APA style manual rather than relying on this template. (I preferred only one space after a period, two spaces after a period are suggested by the sixth-edition APA manual at the top of page 88.), that I am in debt to an unknown author who spared me the inconvenience of having to create my own templates from scratch. Keywords: writing, template, sixth, edition, APA, format, style, self-discipline Prioritizing Project on Portfolio Management and IT Project. The key points of the Article of the project is the prioritizing of two project namely Portfolio Investment in lowest investment and maximization of its income and It Project - its comparison pros and cons of the two projects. Project 1. The Portfolio Management : How to prioritize and manage projects for maximum value. In a do more –with –less investment and less efforts and pain , the investment and wealth managers are in the position of saying no to new spending ideas. That makes at is very vital to actively engage the business side in IT planning. A person can consider it sharing responsibility for making hard choices; or he / she could think of it as building a common view of the organization’s priorities. . Heading Level – Immerse the Business First Making Investment smartly: One way to immerse the business feet first its through portfolio management . Using this process, technology and business leaders to identify the goals of the business , and than use objective criteria to prioritize and manage projects to achieve the highest value from the IT portfolio. All projects are viewed in relation to one another, not on a standalone basis. High –Risk projects are balanced with low risk and short term with long term. It follows the same principles as those employed in managing a financial portfolio. For the sake of understanding, a user / investor / beneficiary might look at this / her /their portfolio and realize that the most of the It projects are in sales and none in manufacturing. That might be due to less real needs and more to the fact that the CEO of the sales division is a master at scoring It investment in US dollars. A portfolio management approach attempts to take the politics out of investment decisions by taking a birds-eye-view of the enterprise. Mr. Tim , a IT-Runner’s Vice President and Executive programs research director , said there are two big differences between the traditional way of choosing IT projects and its portfolio. Heading level 3. (Life Cycle of the Project) The first is a life cycle view of a project. “In the past, once you got approval, no more looked at the project again. User got a blank check. Under portfolio management, every time you review - typically quarterly – user look at every project and say , does it make sense ? if it doesn’t , the user may kill it , Tim sais. Heading level 4.( the second thought) The second is that looking at all projects together allows the user to spot / detect imbalances – too many high risk projects or vice versa , too many safe investments implies lesser income and growth. The user may link the risk aspect in beta term – systematic and unsystematic risk aspect – continually re-balance to ensure maximum value within risk framework Heading level 5.[( Project prioritizing – II- Identification, (mutually exclusive)] Identify It projects for a real or made up company of the users choice. The user can draw on their / his / her past experience or create his / her own projects. Pick 3 to 5 projects so that the user can compare projects described in the assignment. The paper/ pprojects must evaluate each identified project against the following criteria:
The Comparison and differences: The Project I is classical guideline for project evaluation and prioritize and project II is based on past experience and apply judicial mind. The first one guidelines for beginners and the second one for the experienced. The first one concentrate on wealth maximization , whereas the second one emphasize on the required return (cut off) the user risk management Heading 5. (The Urgency of each projects ) As the user is holding the enough resources to invest and the interest earning is very low than the targeted income, So it is utmost urgent to identify the viable projects and invest into them. The abnormal delay defy the very purpose of project prioritizing. Heading 6 ( Cost delaying the expected benefits) The corpus of fund was received from the various stake holders to earn more and more money that the bank interest or interest from safe federal bonds. So the investment Manager has a prime responsibility to prioritize some projects and make an intelligent portfolio of It projects and can also invest some pertion in other viable projects to keep the beta risk, systematic as well as unsystematic risks. Citations and References Reference : CIO awards The Homework Market. References Chuck Tucker – Vice President of Gartner Eminent books on Portfolio Management and Risk Management. Footnotes 1 Some professional journals ask authors to avoid using footnotes. In an undergraduate paper they are almost never necessary. |
