Whats wrong with the following argument Justin wanted to go

What\'s wrong with the following argument? Justin wanted to go out last night, but John told him that the night is dark and full of terrors. Terrors! So, Justin should be afraid and not go out at night. The argument appeals to emotion. The argument appeals to reason. There is nothing wrong with this argument. The argument appeals to violence. We represent declarative sentences in sentential logic using symbols like letters that serve as variables numbers from 1 -10 truth values (T or F) I tossed a fair coin 10 times in a row and it came up heads each time. The chance that it will come up heads on the 11th coin toss is: 1 in 11 .015 1 in 2 O 2 in 3 If all paths close, the argument is. Invalid Valid Sound Unsound

Solution

(40) The argument appeals to emotion beacuse john is taking advantage of emotions to manipulate through fear rather than convincing credibly: Option (1)

(41) A declarative sentence is a proposition to which we can assign a truthvalue of either true or false. Letters such as p, q, r, s, ... or A, B, C, D, ... are used to represent propositions or declarative sentences.

So option (2) Letters that serve as variables is correct

(42)The probability is 1/2
Since a fair coin is tossed, The probability of getting a head or a tail is an independent event.
It does not depend in any way on what are the previous outcomes of tossing. So there is probability of 1/2 for getting both heads and tails independently.

So Option (3) 1 in 2 is correct

(43) If all paths are inactive or closed, the argument is valid (option (2))