Impact on logistics and supply chain from the repeal of net

Impact on logistics and supply chain from the repeal of net neutrality

Read, watch vidieo and answer 2 of the question

Article link:

https://www.foodlogistics.com/technology/news/12020731/how-important-is-net-neutrality-to-supply-chain-innovation

video to help understand

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltzy5vRmN8Q

1.what are some ways the consumers, small businesses or the entrepreneurs may be affected by the repeal of net neutrality?

2. How feasible is it for \"big bucks\" companies to buy out internet service providers to use as a competitive strategy?

3. Do you think the Internet Service Provides will take advantage of the repeal and favor certain companies? How and why?

Solution

Net neutrality refers to the principle that all internet traffic is treated and considered equal. There is no distinction between who posts the content and why, and all types of content are meted the same treatment. It is this equality that allows any and everyone access to the information they require and it has resulted in creating a dynamic online world that people know today as the internet.

Most nearby organizations spread the news around by having a convincing on the web nearness. Unhindered internet permits that as it makes everything fair. This implies individuals scanning for items, data or administrations can get to what they like on-request. This entrance isn\'t represented by the cash the clients or organizations have. Be that as it may, on the off chance that you expel this level playing field, web access suppliers will be in all out control. This will eat rivalry, constrain purchasers\' entrance and back off the web.

By and by, a customer can get to Netflix to watch films or show as and when they like and that too rapidly. Be that as it may, with internet fairness gone, Comcast can limit the individual from getting to Netflix. Rather, they guarantee the individual has quicker access to Comcast\'s video gushing administration. As it were, Netflix video gushing will be moderate, however Comcast\'s will be quick. Along these lines, fundamentally, the purchaser loses their entitlement to pick what they like. Rather, with internet fairness gone, they are compelled to acknowledge what is offered to them. Should this happen, the effect on nearby organizations will decimate.

2. Imagine a bunch of power companies competing with each other in the same geographical location. There would be wires everywhere. You would have to get new wires if you switched companies. You would have multiple companies building power plants to compete for the lucrative high-population areas and nobody wanting to invest in rural communities because the population density mean infrastructure investments won\'t pay for themselves. This was a real issue in America with telegraph companies. You can look up pictures of cities with thousands of telegraph wires clogging up the streets. It was pretty insane.

So what\'s the solution? Well local government didn\'t want to be in the business of providing power and taxing for it, and they certainly didn\'t want to raise taxes to pay for the infrastructure investment. So somebody got the idea to sell license for a monopoly. You give one company the ability to be a monopoly for a specific region. They front the cash to build the infrastructure, and they get to borrow and raise that cash on guaranteed future revenues from their regional monopoly.

3. Repealing those rules would allow Internet providers to experiment with new ways to make money. In recent years, some broadband companies, such as AT&T, have tried offering discounts on Internet service to Americans as long as they agree to let the company monitor their Web browsing history, for example. Other companies, such as Verizon, have tried to drive users to their own apps by exempting them from mobile data limits.

One major beneficiary of the FCC’s rule-change may be AT&T, which is embroiled in a major legal dispute with the Justice Department over an $85 billion purchase of the entertainment conglomerate Time Warner.