answer this question please subject HighLevel VLSI Design Me

answer this question please

subject

High-Level VLSI Design Methodology

High-Level VLSI Design Methodology

HW2: Task-3 RTL programing Simplified CPU architecture SPEC: ALU Define your own instruction format (32bits) OP: operation code. (at least 3 bits) Register bank RS1: source register-1 RS2: source ALU RD: destination register Plan your own memory Memory MISC: other bits for extension purpose. address partiti Instructions: (minimum requirement: 8) DON\'T copy-paste from ECE4150 (which is structure level of coding). We do behavior coding here! CPU vs. Instruction memory CPU vs. Register Bank Sample Instruction: add $s0, $s1, $s2 CPU MEMORY 255 REG 1\'s REG 1\'s value 32, REG 2\'s REG 2\'s (RD) WRITE REG 10000 DATA TO WRITE Control Sig. Write Sig. 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Let\'s load our program into memory: add $50 $s2 Data (8-bit wide 1 byte) 00000010 00110010 10000000 00100000

Solution

Unique

There are at present a few techniques accessible and being used for valuation (weighting) inside the system

of Life Cycle Evaluation. On the off chance that reviews they frequently deliver distinctive outcomes. The point of this paper is to

fundamentally survey by and by accessible and operational strategies keeping in mind the end goal to check whether any of them can be

suggested for utilize. Among the techniques that are looked into is the EPS-framework, the Earth strategy,

financial valuation in view of the effect pathway examination approach, the ecoscarcity strategy, the Ecoindicator

95 and other separation to target strategies. The real conclusion is that none of the by and by

accessible techniques can be suggested for use as a LCA valuation (weighting) strategy today. This is

predominantly on the grounds that they either experience the ill effects of critical datagaps, incorporate irregularities, need avocation of

significant suspicions, or in light of the fact that they are not valuation techniques by any means. Better strategies can however be

created which satisfy essential prerequisites concerning consistency, support of presumptions,

straightforwardness and without to extreme datagaps. Additionally examine here is along these lines required and

roused. Research ought to concentrate on monetisation and board strategies. Different methodologies have intrinsic

restrictions which confine their handiness as weighting strategies

1 Presentation

1.1 Life Cycle Appraisal

Life-cycle appraisal (LCA) concentrates the natural angles and potential effects of an item

for the duration of its life from crude material obtaining through generation, utilize and transfer (i.e. from cradleto-grave)

(ISO, 1997a). The general classes of natural effects requiring thought incorporate

asset utilize, human wellbeing, and biological contemplations (in the same place.).

LCA is one apparatus utilized for portraying natural effects. Cases of other natural

administration devices incorporate Hazard Evaluation, Natural Effect Appraisal, Ecological Inspecting,

Substance Stream Investigation, Vitality Examination, and Material Stream Examination (see e.g. Unknown, 1997,

Cowell et al., 1997, Moberg, 1999, Moberg et al, 1999, Wrisberg and Gameson, 1998, for a

discourse on related apparatuses). What makes LCA exceptional is the \"support to-grave\" approach consolidated with

its concentrate on items, or rather the capacities that items give. \"Items\" are translated in a

\"wide\" sense, and incorporate both material items and administrations. For instance, \"dealing with civil.

A critical element of the ISO structure is the Understanding stage where general conclusions from

the review are to be drawn. These conclusions ought to be founded on data from all different stages and

components of the LCA. This suggests the outcomes from the valuation component won\'t really be

indistinguishable to the conclusions attracted the translation. Utilizing a valuation technique is in this way something

not the same as reaching inferences (Lindfors et al, 1995a). To utilize a valuation strategy can be a method for

breaking down the outcomes. Comes about because of the valuation can be contingent: if a specific valuation strategy with a

certain arrangement of qualities is utilized then a specific outcome is gotten. By utilizing a few valuation techniques and sets

of qualities, a few outcomes can be gotten, which can be utilized when conclusions are to be drawn and

proposals are to be made in the translation stage.

The system portrayed above has been produced amid the 1990s. It is to a great extent the same as in

SETAC\'s \'Code of Practice\' (Consoli et al, 1993), and in various rules (e.g. Heijungs et al., 1992;

Vigon et al., 1993; Lindfors et al., 1995a; and Wenzel et al., 1997). The improvement of effect

evaluation strategies amid the 1990s has on a fundamental level took after two unique ways, advancement of

single-stride strategies and multi-step techniques (Guinée, 1994). The single-stride strategies don\'t partitioned

between the diverse subcomponents of the effect appraisal. Illustrations are the Ecoscarcity strategy

Weighting techniques

A few techniques for valuation regarding LCA has been created amid the 1990s and are

being utilized. A few audits and dialog papers on valuation strategies have been distributed amid the

a years ago (e.g. Bengtsson, 1998, Braunschweig et al, 1994, Eriksson et al, 1996, Finnveden, 1996,

Giegrich et al, 1995, Hertwich et al, 1997, Hofstetter, 1996, Lindeijer, 1996, Lindfors et al, 1995a and

b, Magnussen et al, 1998, and Powell et al, 1997). It has likewise been demonstrated that diverse valuation

techniques in the event that reviews will give diverse outcomes (e.g. Baumann and Rydberg, 1994, Lindfors et al,

1995a and b, Braunschweig, 1994, Guinée, 1995, Magnussen et al, 1998, Notarnicola et al, 1998).