ACat Corporation is committed to the pursuit of a robust sta

A-Cat Corporation is committed to the pursuit of a robust statistical process control (quality control) program to monitor the quality of its transformers. Ratnaparkhi, aware that the construction of quality control charts depends on means and ranges, provides the following descriptive statistics for 2006 (from Exhibit 1).

2006

Mean 801.1667

Standard Error 24.18766

Median 793

Mode 708

Standard Deviation 83.78851

Sample Variance 7020.515

Kurtosis -1.62662

Skewness 0.122258

Range 221

Minimum 695

Maximum 916

Sum 9614

Count 12

The operations manager is assigned the task of developing descriptive statistics for the remaining years, 2007–2010, that are to be submitted to the quality control department. A-Cat’s president asks Mittra, his vice-president of operations, to provide the sales department with an estimate of the mean number of transformers that are required to produce voltage regulators. Mittra, recalling the product data from 2006, which was the last year he supervised the production line, speculates that the mean number of transformers that are needed is less than 745 transformers. His analysis reveals the following: t = 2.32 p = .9798 This suggests that the mean number of transformers needed is not less than 745 but at least 745 transformers. Given that Mittra uses older (2006) data, his operations manager knows that he substantially underestimates current transformers requirements. She believes that the mean number of transformers required exceeds 1000 transformers and decides to test this using the most recent (2010) data. Initially, the operations manager possessed only data for years 2006 to 2008. However, she strongly believes that the mean number of transformers needed to produce voltage regulators has increased over the three-year period. She performs a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) analysis that follows:

2006

2007

2008

779

845

857

802

739

881

818

871

937

888

927

1159

898

1133

1072

902

1124

1246

916

1056

1198

708

889

922

695

857

798

708

772

879

716

751

945

784

820

990

Anova: Single Factor

SUMMARY

Groups

Count

Sum

Average

Variance

2006

12

9614

801.1667

7020.515

2007

12

10784

898.6667

18750.06

2008

12

11884

990.3333

21117.88

Source of Variation

SS

df

MS

F

P-value

F crit

Between Groups

214772.2

2

107386.1

6.870739

0.003202

3.284918

Within Groups 515773                                          

     33

15629.48

Total                    730545.2           35                

The results (F = 6.871 and p = 0.003202) suggest that indeed the mean number of transformers has changed over the period 2006–2008. Mittra has now provided her with the remaining two years of data (2009 and 2010) and would like to know if the mean number of transformers required has changed over the period 2006–2010.
Finally, the operations manager is tasked with developing a model for forecasting transformer requirements based on sales of refrigerators. The table below summarizes sales of refrigerators and transformer requirements by quarter for the period 2006–2010, which are extracted from Exhibits 2 and 1 respectively.

Sales of Refrigerators

Transformer Requirements

3832

2399

5032

2688

3947

2319

3291

2208

4007

2455

5903

3184

4274

2802

3692

2343

4826

2675

6492

3477

4765

2918

4972

2814

5411

2874

7678

3774

5774

3247

6007

3107

6290

2776

8332

3571

6107

3354

6792

3513

Questions to be answered!!!

Introduction to the problem:

A. Provide a concise description of the scenario that you will be analyzing. The following questions might help you describe the scenario: What is the type of organization identified in the scenario? What is the organization’s history and problem identified in the scenario? Who are the key internal and external stakeholders? II. Create an analysis plan to guide your analysis and decision making: A. Identify any quantifiable factors that may be affecting the performance of operational processes. Provide a concise explanation of how these factors may be affecting the operational processes. B. Develop a problem statement that addresses the given problem in the scenario and contains quantifiable measures. C. Propose a strategy that addresses the problem of the organization in the given case study and seeks to improve sustainable operational processes. How will adjustments be identified and made?

2006

2007

2008

779

845

857

802

739

881

818

871

937

888

927

1159

898

1133

1072

902

1124

1246

916

1056

1198

708

889

922

695

857

798

708

772

879

716

751

945

784

820

990

Solution

A.

The following are the quantifiable factors that may be affecting the performance of operational process:

B.

Problem scenario:

C.

A-Cat Corporation is committed to the pursuit of a robust statistical process control (quality control) program to monitor the quality of its transformers. Ratn
A-Cat Corporation is committed to the pursuit of a robust statistical process control (quality control) program to monitor the quality of its transformers. Ratn
A-Cat Corporation is committed to the pursuit of a robust statistical process control (quality control) program to monitor the quality of its transformers. Ratn
A-Cat Corporation is committed to the pursuit of a robust statistical process control (quality control) program to monitor the quality of its transformers. Ratn
A-Cat Corporation is committed to the pursuit of a robust statistical process control (quality control) program to monitor the quality of its transformers. Ratn
A-Cat Corporation is committed to the pursuit of a robust statistical process control (quality control) program to monitor the quality of its transformers. Ratn

Get Help Now

Submit a Take Down Notice

Tutor
Tutor: Dr Jack
Most rated tutor on our site