Which of the following is an argument in favor of the war on

Which of the following is an argument in favor of the war on terrorism?

States get to decide who is and who is not a terrorist, but states have perpetrated much more horrific acts than any nonstate terrorist organization.

The daily physical threat from terrorism is vanishingly small compared to other daily threats, like starvation, disease, and grinding poverty. The money spend fighting terrorism could more effectively be spent addressing these other problems facing millions

Allowing terrorism to go unchecked would send a message that violating the law and killing innocent people is legiminate

Terrorism is a tactic used by people who feel oppressed. It is not a thing like \"drugs\" that can be controlled or eliminated

Solution

allowing terrorism to go unchecked would send a message that violating the law and killing innocent people is legiminate

Reason

If the state thinks that terrorism is a malice and the only good way to deal with this is to arrest or kill the terrorist, that will be an absolute justification for war on terror.