There is no evidence to support the idea that there is such

There is no evidence to support the idea that there is such thing as a “math person” or a “nonmath person.” Math is a matter of learning and learning how to learn. What have you seen in the first two topics to either affirm or reject this evidence? What tools in the classroom are you using to aid your learning? Give an example.

Solution

Solution: - The person who acts according to a particular rule is known the expert of that subject. The player can be identified in the ground by his body language. The engineer can be identified when he touches the tools. Actor can be identified in public though he does not play any role. Like this a person can be identified as “math person” or a “non math person.” Maths is based on counting. In addition, subtraction, division and multiplication counting is required. There is logic also which play an important role for the identification of a person. Hence a person who uses logic and counting is math person. Math is a matter of learning and learning how to learn. The basic of the maths is counting.

In the class room the aid of learning are black board, chalks, duster, pointer, charts of a particular topic, overhead projectors to display any topic, computer system with CD etc.

In earlier times teachers used bricks, animals, surrounding things to count. Small Children love the toys. We can use the toys in learning.

In conclusion we can identify a suitable person for math who can convince the students in a logical method.