Please help brainstormchoose a central question for my criti

Please help brainstorm/choose a central question for my critical literature review regarding the moral limits of markets.

The introduction/whatever is as follows; On 16 March 2017, The Economist reported about ‘Prison labour is a billion-dollar industry, with uncertain returns for inmates’. On 14 February 2017, The Los Angeles Times published an Op-Ed asking: ‘Should tech companies pay us for our data?’. On 22 January 2017, The New York Times published an article on ‘Protests in Bangladesh Shake a Global Workshop for Apparel’. In this assignment you are asked to reflect on no less and no more than two of the abovementioned articles and address the question: Are markets based on captive employees (i.e., inmates; people with a cellular phone; people with very limited occupational choice) morally legitimate?

I\'m looking for inspiration/help choosing a central question to write about connected to the topic, any help is very much appreciated!

Edit:

http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21718897-idaho-prisoners-roast-potatoes-kentucky-they-sell-cattle-prison-labour

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/22/business/bangladesh-protest-apparel-clothing.html

http://beta.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-weigend-nanopayments-20170214-story.html

The mentioned articles if you\'re interested

Solution

ARE MARKET BASED ON CAPTIVE EMPLOYEES LEGALLY LEGITIMATE

Peoplelife is based on the income he earn against the work he had done. Be feeds his family from that income. But do a person really earns against the worl potential he had shown. No, obviously he is working under someone who is dominant to him irrespective of his position. Do he really deserve to be in that position. He had educated him not to be someone\'s servent he had worked hard to be self dependent. Not be prisoner of someone\'s mind. But do we really see the hard work he had done. No, the employee is the prisoners who is treated like a captive to his office. Who\'s work is to use his mental and physical stamina against the work he had been appointed.

Market values had spaced in every sphere of life let it be medicine, education, policies even it had affected the individual life.From the above mentioned article we get to know how people are forced to do the things just to earn.

If there would be good balance between the employer and employee there would be happy working environment. If the dominant and egoistic behaviour of the head is kept aside. Our people are full of enthusiasm and youngful mind whos mind is always strike every minute with some new and innovative idea. People are being bounded with limited choices of occupation. They have to keep their education achievements on side to find any kind of job availability. Just because they have to feed their family who are waiting eagerly irrespective of the fact the pain the person is going through as being an employer.

We need to understand that every individual is capable of doing something. We should never underestimate anyone because Earth is round and you never know when the things may go against you. Every individual should be given an equal opportunity to showcase her talent and market should not be limited to some extend. Instead it should spread its wing and showcase its colors and should reach to everyone and being helpful. Government should take the strict initiative againt the wrong market economy.