You are presented the IP space 2052345024 for your company n

You are presented the IP space 205.23.45.0/24 for your company network. Your company has 4 locations with the following needs: HQ: 60 computers A: 10 computers B: 20 computers C: 30 computers The sites are projecting 20% growth over the next 3 years. Propose a network layout that satisfies these requirements. There are multiple correct possible ways to do it.

Solution

In response, two potential approaches can be taken. The first is simply to adopt a portfolio management view of innovation and to assume that, although much expenditure on R&D and IP protection may be wasted, there will be enough successes to more than pay for the failures. While this approach is adopted often by larger companies that can afford such an approach, such an approach is not easy to sustain when financial pressures mount and organizations are looking for short-term costs to cut. The consequence of such financial pressures is that companies operating near the margins of profitability may find that their IP rights coverage is patchy, reflecting fluctuations in their financial position. In unfortunate cases, financial hardship coincides with the creation of a valuable innovation, which then is left unprotected and less exploitable than it might have been.

The second approach is to adopt a case-by-case analysis of each development, taking into account all the information that is available about the innovation’s future prospects. The key feature of such an analysis is the fact that the absence of current revenue early in the life of an invention should not count against it as much as its absence later in the invention’s life. Of course, it is easy to value a stable income stream once an invention has become successful. The essence of valuing early-stage innovation is to be aware that such IP rights represent real options on the future extra income that might be derived from the IP rights that protect the invention.27 But calculating patent values, taking such real options into account, is not straightforward. In practice, patent attorneys and IP managers make implicit valuations of this sort whenever they justify preserving an IP right that is currently unproductive, as long as they foresee some chance of it producing an income stream in the future.

since there are 256 IP address to be distributed.

HQ :60->72->87 ->105->126

A:10->12->15->18->22

B:20->24->29->35->42

C:30->36->44->53->64

these arrows represent after 3 three need will become this much with 20% increase so first, we distribute 1 to 126 to HQ. 127 to148 to A . 149 to 190 to B and 190 to 254 to C at the start only.