The crackdown on Web browsing privacy is resulting in a tens

The crackdown on Web browsing privacy is resulting in a tense situation between advertisers and the public. In addition to restricting third-party cookies, several Web browsers now provide functionality to limit tracking by online advertisers. The U.S. government has even suggested that a Do Not Track (DNT) list be created that would prohibit Web sites and advertising networks from monitoring a Web surfer\'s actions. Similar to the Do Not Call list, DNT would allow users to sign-up for this protection.

However, online advertisers have responded by saying that to restrict tracking would be like requiring television programs to eliminate commercials or magazines to stop accepting print advertisements. As a result of DNT, users who accept tracking would see all of the Web site\'s material, while those who opt out would only see more generalized content. Some web sites may begin to charge customers a monthly fee to read their full content.

Should tracking be restricted? Would you sacrifice viewing your favorite Web sites in return for no tracking? Should Web sites be able to restrict the content that you view based on your choices regarding tracking? If this is not the solution, what would you propose?

Solution

Site tracking cannot be resticted for data publishing sites,because these data
used by several people publisher may wants to know their data based on thier interest.
These websites need to make it easy for people to say No to being tracked. It is scary to me to think that everything

that someone does online is tracked and recorded somewhere.advertisers are down
when their ad doesn\'t seen by any one. cookies considered low risk to security as per my knowledge.
publishers amy pubish their content free on websites then it is bring the cost
control. We can only evolve, as history has proven time and time again. We need to educate ourselves on privacy and security and discover what those terms mean to us as individuals so that we can decide the amount of exposure risk we are willing to tolerate.

Viewing favourite websites in return for no tracking is depends on the user.
websites provides free acces to thier users so they dont track theor data.

Publisshed data my be resticted this decision is tqaken by the publisher
there is chance it is being paid or un paid. If they think that their content they put out will bring people in even though it is restricted.

BUt all the websites maianitain user privacy policy for their security reasons and other.