Someone proposes the following verilog code for a 3to1 multi

Someone proposes the following verilog code for a 3-to-1 multiplexor. What is the value of \"out\' when sel = \"11\'\'? Explain your input reasoning. Support your reasoning by writing a test fixture for mux 3 to 1and apply the following stimulus. Capture the waveform. Data = 3\'b010 sel = 2\'b11, 2\'b00, 2\'b10, 2\'b11, 2\'b01, 2\'b11 Clearly this is a poorly written verilog code. Fix the code so that it truly reflects a 3-to-1 mux with out = X when sel = 2\'b11. Rerun the test with the same test fixture and capture the waveform.

Solution

These mediations were picked on the grounds that they are unmistakable in the writing and give differing qualities

as far as their objectives, measures of results, and understudy populaces. For every mediation we have

developed tables of fixings and their expenses; close by, we have made advantage maps to outline

the conceivable advantages every intercession may present and figured the fiscal estimation of the

part of advantages that could be distinguished and measured in view of the outcomes revealed in the effect

assessment. We then processed fitting monetary measurements – advantage cost proportions and net present

values – and performed affectability testing to check whether the outcomes are hearty to option determinations.

Our focal question is whether a scope of various SEL intercessions, both independently and in

the total, demonstrate benefits that surpass their expenses. We perceive the way that we have caught as it were

a part of their advantages in light of the fact that not the greater part of their belongings are completely measured and can be promptly changed over

into fiscal measures of their advantages