Jones and Shephard Accountants case attached at the bottom C

Jones and Shephard Accountants case attached at the bottom: Case Study Questions:

1,Provide a synopsis of the Jones and Shephard case.

2,Highlight three enterprise management causes/considerations and three project management causes/considerations for the situation. Include what seemed to be missing.

3,Consider that you are the systems manager who is now responsible for redesigning the organizational structure. What areas need to be addressed for the transition and how will they benefit the company? How will you interact with the upper managers in the company? How do you make this a transition with the least impact on the employees and the customers?

4,How should the transition to a new project management operation be accomplished? Consider what the enterprise should need to know about project management and the new structure. How much time do you recommend for the transition to the matrix organizations? Be sure to include your rationale.

5,What other organizational changes should be made? How do you work with the manager of operations to gain his/her support for your organizational changes?

By 1990, Jones and Shephard Accountants, Inc. (J&S) was a midsized company and ranked 38th in size by the American Association of Accountants. In order to compete with the larger firms, J&S formed an Information Services Division designed primarily for studies and analyses. By 1995, the Information Services Division (ISD) had fifteen employees.
In 1997, the ISD purchased three largecomputers. With this increased capacity, J&S expanded its services to help satisfy the needs of outside customers. By September 1998, the internal and external workloads had increased to a point where the ISD now employed over fifty people.
The director of the division was very disappointed in the way that activities were being handled. There was no single person assigned to push through a project, and outside customers did not know whom to call to get answers regarding project status. The director found that most of his time was being spent on day-to-day activities such as conflict resolution instead of strategic planning and policy formulation.
The biggest problems facing the director were the two continuous internal projects (called Project X and Project Y, for simplicity) that required month-end data collation and reporting. The director felt that these two projects were important enough to require a full-time project manager on each effort.
In October 1998, corporate management announced that the ISD director would be reassigned on February 1, 1999, and that the announcement of his replacement would not be made until the middle of January. The same week that the announcement was made, two individuals were hired from outside the company to take charge of Project X and Project Y. Exhibit 3–1 shows the organizational structure of the ISD.
Within the next thirty days, rumors spread throughout the organization about who would become the new director. Most people felt that the position would be filled from within the division and that the most likely candidates would be the two new project managers. In addition, the associate director was due to retire in December, thus creating two openings.
On January 3, 1999, a confidential meeting was held between the ISD director and the systems manager.
ISD Director: “Corporate has approved my request to promote you to division director. Unfortunately, your job will not be an easy one. You\'re going to have to restructure the organi-zation somehow so that our employees will not have as many conflicts as they are now faced with. My secretary is typing up a confidential memo for you explaining my observations on the problems within our division.
“Remember, your promotion should be held in the strictest confidence until the final announcement later this month. I\'m telling you this now so that you can begin planning the restructuring. My memo should help you.” (See Exhibit 3–2 for the memo.)
The systems manager read the memo and, after due consideration, decided that some form of matrix would be best. To help him structure the organization properly, an outside consultant was hired to help identify the potential problems with changing over to a matrix. The following problem areas were identified by the consultant:

Solution

1.

The synopsis of Jones and Shephard case is all about that they had settled an accounting firm in the 1990s. They started dealing with many projects with many clients across the global network. Their prime motto is to compete with the leading accounting firms and come to the top position in serving the customers. But the later the management functionalities are found to be improper no fixed assign responsibilities have been given to the employees which the clients were facing the difficulties in getting in touch with the purpose of projects.

2.

1. Mutual Co-operation

2. Leadership qualities

3. Improper management and lack of improper activities.

3.

To bring the transition it is required to structure the organizational objectives, culture and fixing the goal which is highly essential in the organization before landing up of setting any strategies.

The upper managers are requiring to address the issues of the organization that to maintain a workforce, clearing constraints and sorting employee issues. Among all the above, the constraints are the major factor which will highlight the company process and will help to make it smoother so it is important to address the upper manager who mostly fixes this issue to maintain a good organization working culture.

The transition impact should not affect the working process of the employees and on the other hand, customer interaction can be made accordingly without letting the service down. The customer preference has to be given the first priority in this context and also employee benefits are also essential. All the decision for an effective transition is required to be taken in such a manner that the organization work process gets updated in a natural and quickest way so that it gets familiar to them.

4.

The main transition in the project management consideration is to maintain the organizational mutual co-ordination by a group leader or the director. The director/ group leader needs to recruit effective project managers in the organization and they should be formulated in a team. The project manager will be held up the project with the team. Each process will be maintained with full efficiency and naturally, within two to three weeks the process of the work culture will be boosted.

5.

The other organizations change is to hire many telephone callers who will make sells call and also receive calls from the customers about to make queries and complaints related to project.

To gain the support it is required to keep the focus on the process of the organization. Sometimes it may decision making and other the most important fixing the marketing strategies which are required to be correctly formulated in the organization.