The article CyberTerrorism in a PostStuxnet World states tha

The article \"Cyber-Terrorism in a Post-Stuxnet World\" states that there have been very few cyber-terrorism events of note in the world. Based on the first few pages of the article (pages 111-112 or so) and the articles closing sections (Moving Beyond Hyperbole and Conclusion), as well as your own thoughts, why do you believe more attacks have not been seen? Do you believe more cyber-terrorism lies in our future? Why or why not? Please respond with your discussion post of at least 300 words

Bb Module 3: Controlling Files C chegg study l Guided solut E Cyber-Terrorism in a Po x canopy uc.edu 3 /courses 2171-1 18IT 20300004/217 1-1-18IT20300004 ImportedContent 20170105083412/Cyber-Terrorism%20in%20a%20Post-Stuxnet%20World.pdf n the rhetoric on gher-terrorius by edbiring boa it drter front oler. of 18 temanntr ures is their ading to exploit the Intemet m raise fumar, researab targets, and mtportern rather than engage in gher tempriow. Sher terrorism may well oscur in the future, but for ombre aime, backtipimp, and gverwagiar are more prearing wirtualdangers n 2 major speech on cyber-security in October 2012 then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta warned that the United States faced a great danger from violent extremist groups that could use computer attacks to derail passenger trains. contaminate the water supply in major cities, or ahut down the power gad acroea large parte of the country.\" The combined effect of auch an attack, the Secretary declared, would be nothing less than a \"cyber Pearl Harbor that would paralyze and shock the nation and create a new, profound sense of tulnerability While Secretary Panetta was responding to a wave of cyber-attacks against U-s. financial institutions in the months leading up to his speech, similar warnings had been issued in the past. Since the widespread adoption of the Internet in the 1990s, government officials, journalists, and computer security experts frequently have described Leon E. Panetta. \"Remarks by Secretary Panetta on Cybersecurity to the Business tires for National S ty, N York Oot. 11, 2012. defen 36 O 2015 Published for the Foreign Prliky Research Institute by Elsevier Lud winter 2015 1111 doi 10.1016Morbis 2014. Ask me anything a 5.58 PM 1/26/2017

Solution

They believe that cyber attacks have not been seeen because it didn\'t happened yet on large scale like controlling the flood gates,poisoning the fresh water,etc .Till now,it never effected people physically.But,the main point is cyber attacks main agenda is mainly to steal information.Terrorist steal information in-order to move forward in physical attacks or also by hacking banks and companies they can even finance themselves.

Yes,more terrorism lies in future.I hate this terrorism but this is a fact.Cyber crime costs the global economy over US$400 billion per year, according to estimates by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In 2013, some 3,000 companies in the United States had their systems compromised by criminals, the Center reports.And ,this statistics grew year-by-year.People get more educated and very talented people are getting lured by terrorists on basis of money and religion.But,companies are also taking precautions and tightening their security in-order to prevent all those.Cyber crime is much a safer type of terrorism even the terrorist just need a desktop which connects to network,they can even shake the world by that.But,in order to eradicate .people needs to be get educated.