Problem 5 Efficient frontier and portfolio choice Consider t
Problem 5 (Efficient frontier and portfolio choice)
Consider the following expected returns, volatilities, and correlations:
Stock
Expected return
Standard deviation
Correlation with Duke Energy
Correlation with Microsoft
Correlation with Wal-Mart
Duke Energy
14%
6%
1
-1
0
Microsoft
44%
24%
-1
1
0.7
Wal-Mart
23%
14%
0
0.7
1
(a) Consider a portfolio consisting of only Duke Energy and Microsoft. The percentage of your investment (portfolio weights) that you would place in Microsoft stock to achieve a risk-free investment should be closest to:
(1) 15%
(2) 4%
(3) 23%
(4) 10%
(b) The expected return of a portfolio that is equally-invested in Duke Energy and Microsoft is closest to:
(1) 28%
(2) 29%
(3) 24%
(4) 23%
(c) The volatility of a portfolio that is equally-invested in Duke Energy and Microsoft is closest to:
(1) 8%
(2) 9%
(3) 11%
(4) 6%
(d) The expected return of a portfolio that consists of a long position of $10,000 in Wal-Mart and a short position of $2,000 in Microsoft is closest to:
(1) 21%
(2) 12%
(3) 27%
(4) 18%
(e) The volatility of a portfolio that consists of a long position of $10,000 in Wal-Mart and a short-position of $2,000 in Microsoft is closest to:
(1) 9%
(2) 14%
(3) 11%
(4) 12%
(f) Consider a portfolio consisting of only Microsoft and Wal-Mart. Calculate the expected return on such a portfolio when the weight on Microsoft is 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%.
(g) Consider a portfolio consisting of only Microsoft and Wal-Mart. Calculate the volatility of such a portfolio when the weight on Microsoft is 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%.
(h) Plot the efficient frontier.
Problem 5 (Efficient frontier and portfolio choice)
Consider the following expected returns, volatilities, and correlations:
| Stock | Expected return | Standard deviation | Correlation with Duke Energy | Correlation with Microsoft | Correlation with Wal-Mart |
| Duke Energy | 14% | 6% | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| Microsoft | 44% | 24% | -1 | 1 | 0.7 |
| Wal-Mart | 23% | 14% | 0 | 0.7 | 1 |