In the past few years a few small towns have enacted legisla

In the past few years, a few small towns have enacted legislation that require every homeowner to own a gun. Crime has dropped significantly in those towns. Studies by experts have proven that higher crime rates drive businesses out of a community and interfere with interstate commence. A new President of the United States and a majority of both houses of Congress think that for the greater good of all the citizens in the country, it will be best if all adult citizens are armed. Crimes interfere with interstate commerce and therefore the U.S. Congress has the power to regulate it. The U.S. Congress passes a law that requires all adults living in the United States to do the following:

Are these provisions more socialistic or more capitalistic in nature? Please make sure your rationale is sound. You should submit at least one paragraph to support your answer.

Own at least one firearm

Take a federal gun training and safety course

Obtain and carry liability insurance

Failure to abide with this law will result in a significant tax penalty

Solution

I believe this binding law that all adults leaving in united states should be equipped with gun is capitalistic because it is the in alienable right of an innocent individual -one who initiates neither force nor fraud - to own weapons , including guns.Furthermore , we maintain that there is an even more important practical reason for honest men and women to own and to know how to use guns: the ability to defend their rights and lives against a government devolving into dictatorship.history shows that oppressive regimes , to maintain brutal control over their subjects , impose stringent gun control laws.

however it\'s fear that one may use such power for personal benefits and for the country, we can say it\'s huge set back for the rule that one innocent may lose his life wich can not be return to his family whether it is in terms of money or any other facilities.recently many people protested against this law due to above reason.This type of law require stringent monitoring and not only implementation only insurance liability and tax liability is not enough.q

However this rule can give equal right to everyone in the states can protect themselves against any attacks.so rule require some modifications with greater monitoring