Why are traditional definitions of interception problematic

Why are traditional definitions of “interception” problematic when applying them to electronic communications?

Solution

The solution provided is in accordance to US Cyber law

tradationally prior to the passage of the patriot act provided for the collection and/or recording of number diales, in fact, content of communication were specifically precluded by previous legislation whereas Title II of the act specifically provides for the disclosure of communication content,reduce tradational requirement of probable cause, and equates telephone and internet communcations .

Glimpse of Title II and Electronic Survellance

Section 201 and Section 202 : expanded the authority to intercept wire,orla and electronic communication to crimes of terrorism and computer crimes whereas before this in Patriot Act, law enforcement had access to stores electronic communication but not to stored wire communication.
Section 206 amended FISA to provide for roving surveillance in situtations where action of the target may thwart the investigation or identification of persons.