Q7 Three mutually exclusive alternatives are being evaluated
Solution
(a)
Alternative I:
Annual Revenue = $ 250000, Annual Expense = $ 50000
Net Income = 250000 - 50000 = $ 200000
Market Value (at project completion) = $ 50000
Capital Investment = $ 300000 and Project Tenure = 10 years
MARR = 20 %
PW of Market Value and Net Income = 200000 x (1/0.2) x [1-{1/(1.2)^(10)}] + 50000 / (1.2)^(10) = $ 846569.696
Net PW = 846569.696 - 300000 = $ 546569.696
Alternative II:
Annual Revenue = $ 100000, Annual Expense = $ 50000
Net Income = 100000 - 50000 = $ 50000
Market Value (at project completion) = $ 50000
Capital Investment = $ 450000 and Project Tenure = 10 years
MARR = 20 %
PW of Market Value and Net Income = 50000 x (1/0.2) x [1-{1/(1.2)^(10)}] + 50000 / (1.2)^(10) = $ 217698.883
Net PW = 217698.883 - 450000 = - $ 232301.117
Alternative III:
Annual Revenue = $ 200000, Annual Expense = $ 100000
Net Income = 200000 - 100000 = $ 100000
Market Value (at project completion) = $ 100000
Capital Investment = $ 600000 and Project Tenure = 10 years
MARR = 20 %
PW of Market Value and Net Income = 100000 x (1/0.2) x [1-{1/(1.2)^(10)}] + 100000 / (1.2)^(10) = $ 435397.767
Net PW = 435397.767 - 600000 = - $ 164602.233
As Alternative I is the only option that gives a positive NPW, the same is economically acceptable and should be chosen.
(b) Although the total capital investment budget is $ 500000, only one alternative generates value for the firm (has positive NPW) and therefore only Alternative 1 should be selected at a capital investment of $ 300000. The other two investments generate negative value (negative NPW) and should not be taken up even if the budget is available.

