Let B be the set of rational numbers in the interval 0 1 and
Solution
Proof :
Since 0 A, there is an open interval J1 in {In} such that 0 J1.
Let J1 = (a1, b1). Note that a1 < 0 and b1 > 0.
If b1 1, then L(I) l( J1) = b1 a1 1. Suppose not. If a11 is rational, then I can find an open interval J2 {In} such that a1 J2.
If a1 is irrational, I consider the following cases.
Case 1. There is an open interval J2 such that a1 J2.
Case 2. There is an open interval J2 such that a1 is the right endpoint of J2.
Case 3. Otherwise. We claim that Case 3 is impossible. Consider the following sub collection K1, ..., Km where Ki {I In|a1 < x for all x I}. Thus we select a open interval K0 = (x, y) nearest a1. Hence (a1, x) Q cannot be covered by any elements of {In}, a contradiction. Hence we can find J2 in Case 1 and Case 2.
Continue the process to find out J3, .... Since {In} is a finite covering of A, this process can be done in finite steps.
Hence L(In) Jn = (an+1 an) = am – a1.
Note that am 1 and an 0.
Hence L(In)>1 , here we can replace L(In)=m(Ik)
So m(Ik)>1.
.
![Let B be the set of rational numbers in the interval [0, 1], and let {I_k}^n_k=1 be a finite collection of open intervals that covers B. Prove that Sigma^n_k=1 Let B be the set of rational numbers in the interval [0, 1], and let {I_k}^n_k=1 be a finite collection of open intervals that covers B. Prove that Sigma^n_k=1](/WebImages/5/let-b-be-the-set-of-rational-numbers-in-the-interval-0-1-and-984880-1761505892-0.webp)