In cases of disasters such as the September 11th attack on t

In cases of disasters, such as the September 11th attack on the World Trade Center, DNA evidence is sometimes necessary to identify victims. If an individual doesn\'t have a DNA profile on file, identity must be reconstructed by comparing the victim\'s DNA to that of a relative. Clearly, a DNA profile database could be of great use in cases where DNA-based identification is required, but it is also highly controversial.

Many nations, including the US, already maintain a national DNA database of samples collected during criminal investigations, but there are often questions of whether such databases should be expanded to include more individuals, or whether their use is ethical at all. What arguments can you make for and against \"banking\" DNA profiles (i.e. \"genetic fingerprints\" based on STRs, not necessarily full genome sequences) in a database? Do you believe such databases are ethical or an invasion of privacy? Should it be mandatory for some or all individuals? What restrictions would you place on it?

Solution

Though the national DNA database has proved to be a valuable tool in a fight against crime but still many people are concerned about X privacy the DNA profile provides very little information about someone bbut baby Annaya sample contains information that can reveal their ethnicity or susceptibility of disease.

1. Yes: The information derived from is DNA profile can be a powerful tool in the fight against crime searching dog database to find a DNA profile match helps identify a suspect in around 60% cases in the UK moreover a DNA database helps to keep track of criminals around the world. It also helps in identifying missing people.

2. No: individuals on the DNA database may be seen as potential offenders rather than law abiding citizens the database is extended beyond just convicted criminals everyone would be seen as possible subsets maintaining a DNA database is usually expensive father father keeping a DNA database is seen by many as a father in French ment of privacy and human rights DNA sample for rally destroyed meaning that the information derived from his sample could potentially be accessed by anyone.

Keeping in mind all the pros and cons of the maintaining DNA database government should take proper measures inorder to cope up the things.

Restrictions:

Shouldnt be accessible to everyone.

Records should be maintained with great care

Sophisticated machine to protect information

Only for the purpose of nation not fpr personal use.