Argue AGAINST the use animals in research on brains and beha

Argue AGAINST the use animals in research on brains and behavior. Demonstrate understanding of the critical issues on both sides of this ethical dilemma.

Solution

Thanks for your question.

Humans are also a sort of evolved animals. But the difference is humans are responsible to their creator. The creator has given them five sense, intelligence, abilty to feel all for a reason and purpose. The creator has expectiations from humans for giving them all these gifts. For example if we dont use our parts of body in a prescribed manner there are tell tale signs of how they can get sick or incapacitated. This includes for human brains also. If the brains dont function as they are supposed to, it eliminates their responsibility to their creator. This life is not a whimsical fantasy where humans can do whatever they want. Their are prescribed practices for everything. Therfore altering any of their natural faculties means throwing to wind all the responsibility humans owe to their creator. This creates a precarious imbalance in the functions of humans and expectation from their creator. Who can take responsibility for this expect the one who decided to alter this exercise of control of the human life.

I dont really know if this is true for other animals but it somehow seems it maybe atleast partially if not fully , other than humans. all animal eat, sleep, reproduce, have different gifted functions within each species. Is it approprite to eliminate their exercise of control such that they have no acountability to their creator. Do we need to break that connection between life and its creator to understand science. Is it not available in some source, this knowledge that we seek to gain from fleecing animal in cages and labs around the world. What we need to understand are the expectations from our creator, not trying to act like as if we want to play his part. The unseen, unknown, undefined, unidentified is always a mystery that justifies us to push animals to all sort of extreme limits. But is it already known to us, this understanding and knowledge that we seek to gain. Is it all really a necessity, or is it just our ignorance which make us push these animals to the edge to physical and mental torture. Who will take responsibility and accountibility for this. All who have crossed the line will be accountable by the creator. what if he says i had already provided all that knowledge that you tried to seek, bu you had no faith in it and in your ignorance you sacrificed all these innnocent animals. did we gain something or did we loose our path and hence killed all these animals to find where we decided not to be because we did not want to believe without proofs. While believing withour proofs is considered not so wise in practical terms, beleiving when revealed first froma good source is a virtue that has high value with our creator.

Lets say, we wanted to learn about frogs, dogs and rabbits in medical school. We cut one and learnt from it. Is it really necessary to fleece them every year for lakhs of students every year. Are we teaching them to kill and learn rather than telling them what we already know from history.

The question is are we really ready to accept the knowledge, or do we have an ego, arrogance or hig headedness to question whats been proven in the past. Are we so intelligent and special from our ancestors that we will see something they coudnt. Or are we really foolish enough to be blind and deaf to what they already knew and tried to tell us.

The skies will give all the answers sooner or later.

Regards

Regards