Analyze the reasons to invest millions of dollars to detect

Solution

Cost benefit Analysis:

Cost - Benefit Analsis is also called as benefit-cost analysis.It is a systematic approach to estimating the strengths and weakness of alternatives taht satisfy transactions, activities or functional requirements for a business.

It is a technique that is used to determine options that provide the best for thr adoption and practice in terms of benefits in labour, time and cost savings etc.

The cost-benefit analysis is also defines as a systematic process for calculating and comapring benefits and costs of a project , decision and government policy.

Cost-benfit analysis has two purposes:

Cost-benefit is a variant on \'Return on Investment\' (ROI) and similar measures. It\'s handy because when ROI is greater than one.

The assertion that immigrants are a hinderance on the economy is not clear to me, in my capacity as an economics PhD student.

It seems to me that the added economic value would offset the benefits. Let me put it another way: If you think that an additional baby is beneficial for the economy (not necessarily always the case) then an immigrant should be at least as beneficial. (Since another economy already paid the costs.

That is to say nothing of the \"social costs\", but let\'s leave that aside for the moment.

Intuitively, it seems to me that immigrant-receiving countries would have the data to do a very accurate long-term analysis.

Fraud accountability:

Some banks and credit cards issuers may hold your company liable and if fraudisters chage and receive ptoducts and services using stolen customer data and a new form of transcations mean to increase privacy and reduce fraud the it includes all fraud -realted costs , at this the cost benfit analysis is very imporatant and worthwhile in this process.

A movement is afoot to impose cost-benefit analysis (CBA) on financial regulation (CBA/FR).

1 The housing and financial crises of 2008 led to the Dodd-Frank Act,

2which restructured the financial regulatory agencies, mandated more than 200 new rules, and required changes to many older rules.

3 The sweep of regulatory change has reignited criticism for failure to base the changes on adequate CBA/FR.

4 Bills have been introduced to provide explicit authority for the President to require CBA/FR from independent agencies,

5 even as critics argue that existing law already requires the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to conduct a particular form of CBA/FR: judicially enforced quantification.

6 One panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, composed entirely of Republican-appointed judges, held that existing law requires the SEC to quantify the costs and benefits of its proposed rules,

7while another judge—appointed by President Obama to the D.C. Circuit—subsequently held that such quantification is not mandatory, at least when the SEC is required by statute to adopt a rule, and the benefits sought to be achieved are humanitarian and not economic in nature.