Prove by resolution refutation that D is a logical consequen

Prove by resolution refutation that ¬D is a logical consequence of the following axioms:

• A C

• (E ¬F) (¬D G)

• (A C) (D F)

• ¬(C (D C)) (G ¬F)

Solution

// A Dynamic Programming primarily based resolution that uses table C[][] to

// calculate the Binomial constant

#include<stdio.h>

// paradigm of a utility operate that returns minimum of 2 integers

int min(int a, int b);

// Returns worth of Binomial constant C(n, k)

int binomialCoeff(int n, int k)

{

    int C[n+1][k+1];

    int i, j;

    // Caculate worth of Binomial constant in bottom up manner

    for (i = 0; i <= n; i++)

    zero || j == i)

                C[i][j] = 1;

            // Calculate worth victimization previosly keep values

            else

                C[i][j] = C[i-1][j-1] + C[i-1][j];

        }

    }

come back C[n][k];

}

// A utility operate to come back minimum of 2 integers

int min(int a, int b)

{

come back (a<b)? a: b;

}

/* Drier program to check on top of function*/

int main()

main:

j mm

mm:

la $a3, array_A # base address for array_A loaded into $a3

la $a1, array_B # base address for array_B loaded into $a1

la $a2, array_C # base address for array_C loaded into $a2

li $t1, four # $t1 = four (row-size and loop end)

li $s0, zero # i = 0; initialize first for loop

loop1:

li $s1, zero # j = 0; restart 2d for loop

loop2:

li $s2, zero # k = 0; restart third for loop

sll $t2, $s0, two # $t2 = i * four (size of row of c)

addu $t2, $t2, $s1 # $t2 = i * size(row) + j

sll $t2, $t2, two # $t2 = computer memory unit offset of [i][j]

addu $t2, $a2, $t2 # $t2 = computer memory unit offset of [i][j]

lw $t4, 0($t2) # $t4 = two bytes of c[i][j]

loop3:

sll $t0, $s2, two # $t0 = k * four (size of row of b)

addu $t0, $t0, $s1 # $t0 = k * size(row) + j

sll $t0, $t0, two # $t0 = computer memory unit offset off [k][j]

addu $t0, $a1, $t0 # $t0 = computer memory unit address of b[k][j]

lw $t5, 0($t0) # $t5 = two bytes of b[k][j]

sll $t0, $s0, two # $t0 = i * four (size of row of a)

addu $t0, $t0, $s2 # $t0 = i * size(row) + k

sll $t0, $t0, two # $t0 = computer memory unit offset of [i][k]

addu $t0, $a3, $t0 # $t0 = computer memory unit address of a[i][k]

lw $t6, 0($t0) # $t6 = two bytes of a[i][k]

mul $t5, $t6, $t5 # $t5 = a[i][k] * b[k][j]

add $t4, $t4, $t5 # $t4 = c[i][j] + a[i][k] * b[k][j]

Prove by resolution refutation that ¬D is a logical consequence of the following axioms: • A C • (E ¬F) (¬D G) • (A C) (D F) • ¬(C (D C)) (G ¬F)Solution// A Dyn
Prove by resolution refutation that ¬D is a logical consequence of the following axioms: • A C • (E ¬F) (¬D G) • (A C) (D F) • ¬(C (D C)) (G ¬F)Solution// A Dyn

Get Help Now

Submit a Take Down Notice

Tutor
Tutor: Dr Jack
Most rated tutor on our site