For the subspace given a find a basis and b state the dimens
Solution
{[4s,-3s,-t]:s,t in R}
You can tell that there are two \"dimensions\" in this subspace because you have two parameters. This isn\'t a rigorous explanation, but you see that I think.
So to find a basis, you need two things that are linearly independent. The best way to do this is to think of what I just said.
If each parameter represents a dimension, then you can \"reformulate\" this subspace as simply the space R^2 defined by:
R^2 = { (s,t) : s and t are real numbers }
What is the standard basis?
(1,0)
(0,1)
Use that as your guide:
s=1,t=0 in W gives you the vector:
(4,-3,0)
s=0,t=1 in W gives you the vector:
(0,0,-1)
These must be linearly independent (notice where the zeros are in the third, first, and second coordinates). Thus it is a basis:
B = { (4,-3,0) , (0,0,-1) }
Now you can even do more with this! We wanted to say this \"looks like\" R^2. You can now explicitly construct a mapping:
Take w in W. This vector must be of the form:
w = s(4,-3,0) + t(0,0,-1)
for real numbers s and t, since we have B as a basis. We map this element to the element (s,t) in R^2. We notice that it transforms our basis as follows:
s(4,-3,0) + t(0,0,-1) (s,t)
(4,-3,0) (1,0)
(0,0,-1) (0,1)
You can check easily that the map is a proper linear map from one space to another. Because it maps the basis onto the basis, we know the subspace W is equivalent (also called \"isomorphic\") to R^2.
![For the subspace given (a) find a basis and (b) state the dimension {[4s -3s -t] : s, t in R}Solution{[4s,-3s,-t]:s,t in R} You can tell that there are two \ For the subspace given (a) find a basis and (b) state the dimension {[4s -3s -t] : s, t in R}Solution{[4s,-3s,-t]:s,t in R} You can tell that there are two \](/WebImages/8/for-the-subspace-given-a-find-a-basis-and-b-state-the-dimens-996938-1761513168-0.webp)